According to the Office of Inspector General, three out of five claims for standard and complex rehab power wheelchairs did not meet Medicare documentation requirements during the first half of 2007.

WASHINGTON — According to the Office of Inspector General, three out of five claims for standard and complex rehab power wheelchairs did not meet Medicare documentation requirements during the first half of 2007. Those claims accounted for $112 million in improper Medicare payments out of the $189 million total allowed during the six-month period, the OIG said in a report posted Dec. 30.

Based on a random sample of 375 claims selected for review, the report said 60 percent did not meet one or more documentation requirements and two out of five had multiple errors. In addition, the OIG said, suppliers submitted incomplete documents almost three times as often as they failed to submit required documents.

Medicare currently requires the following documentation to support power wheelchair claims:

  • power wheelchair prescription;
  • supporting documentation from the beneficiary's medical record;
  • specialty evaluation report (for complex rehab chairs only);
  • detailed product description;
  • home assessment report; and
  • proof of delivery.

According to the new report, error rates ranged from 1 percent of claims with no proof of delivery to 40 percent of claims for which the supporting documentation and detailed product descriptions were not submitted or were incomplete.

The specialty evaluation report and a detailed product description were the documents most often lacking on complex rehab claims, the report found.

The OIG also noted that documentation error rates varied by power wheelchair type and supplier volume: Complex rehab claims had a higher documentation error rate (93 percent) than standard power chair claims (58 percent); and standard PWC claims from low-volume suppliers — those that submitted fewer than 10 standard PWC claims in the study period — had a higher documentation error rate (72 percent) than those submitted by high-volume suppliers (55 percent).

Based on its review, OIG recommended that CMS improve compliance with PWC documentation requirements by conducting additional reviews of claims; recovering overpayments and considering further actions against suppliers that do not meet documentation requirements; and increasing education for suppliers and prescribing physicians about documentation requirements.

The OIG also recommended that CMS take appropriate action on the sampled claims found to be in error. CMS concurred with the recommendations. For the complete report, go to http://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-04-07-00401.pdf.

In October, the OIG issued a controversial report on providers' costs to purchase power wheelchairs, saying that Medicare could have saved millions on PWCs if its fees had been the same as prices available on the Internet. But the HME industry's mobility segment immediately labeled the report as  flawed and misleading, pointing to the significant difference in cost between an online retail model and a Medicare provider model.

Now, the OIG said, it also plans to issue a report on the "appropriateness (e.g., the medical necessity)" of power wheelchair claims. In addition to determining whether beneficiary medical records supported the medical necessity of the power wheelchair, OIG will determine whether documentation from the suppliers and prescribing physicians was consistent.